The Kenyan government’s decision to grant diplomatic privileges and immunities to the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation through a new legal order has sparked concerns, particularly regarding its implications for Kenya’s agricultural sovereignty.
The order, signed by Cabinet Secretary for Foreign and Diaspora Affairs Musalia Mudavadi on September 19, 2024, took effect on October 4, 2024.
Scope of Immunities
The Privileges and Immunities (Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation) Order, 2024 grants the foundation:
- Corporate legal status in Kenya
- Ability to enter contracts and initiate legal proceedings
- Authority to acquire and dispose of property
- Specific diplomatic privileges for foundation directors, officials, and staff
- Immunities outlined in Part I and III of the Fourth Schedule of the Privileges and Immunities Act
General Implications and Concerns
Critics argue this diplomatic status will further entrench the Foundation’s influence over Kenya’s agricultural policies.
While the order grants the foundation significant operational freedom, it will potentially limit the government’s oversight capabilities. Questions are being raised about:
- Monitoring of foundation activities
- Financial accountability
- Project implementation oversight
- Regulatory compliance
Traditionally, the Gates Foundation would have operated in Kenya like other international NGOs/foundations, which typically means:
- Required registration with the NGO Coordination Board
- Subject to regular NGO compliance requirements
- Standard tax obligations
- Regular visa processes for international staff
The new order (in effect as of October 4, 2024) makes significant changes.
GMO and Seed Policies
The timing of this immunity grant coincides with ongoing debates about:
- Genetic modification policies
- Seed sovereignty
- Industrial agriculture models
- Traditional farming practices
The Foundation’s agricultural initiatives in Kenya have previously faced criticism for:
- Promoting corporate-led farming solutions
- Supporting policies favoring commercial seeds over traditional varieties
- Influencing agricultural policy through funding mechanisms
- Advocating for specific technological solutions
Government Position
The Foreign Affairs ministry frames this as a strategic move to enhance development cooperation.
The order specifically recognizes the foundation’s role in “fighting poverty, disease and inequality” across more than 140 countries globally.
Agricultural Sovereignty Concerns
The diplomatic status raises several critical concerns in light of a Foundation that doesn’t take ‘no’ for an answer:
1. Policy Influence
- Reduced oversight and ability to challenge agricultural initiatives
- Limited public accountability on farming programs and potential impact on seed policies
- Potential bypass of local agricultural governance and effect on small-scale farming policies
2. Research and Development
- Influence over agricultural research priorities
- Impact on local research institutions
- Direction of agricultural innovation
3. Economic Impact
- Position of local seed companies
- Small-scale farmers’ autonomy
- Agricultural market dynamics
4. Food Sovereignty
- Control over agricultural decisions
- Preservation of traditional farming methods and indigenous agricultural knowledge
- Protection of local seed varieties
While diplomatic immunity for private foundations may offer operational advantages, this particular one presents significant risks that require careful consideration and robust mitigation strategies.
Also Read: Alarm As Two Children Die from Polio Vaccine Reaction
Follow the City Digest News channel on WhatsApp here!
Follow the City Digest channel on Telegram here!